The rules of the past participation agreement vary. The basic principles are as follows: ** However, there is always the possibility of a direct object agreement in accordance with paragraph 31/2 above. Have you seen Romain`s new bike? There is a bought one here. [“Romain`s new motorcycle” is the direct object; in the first sentence, there is no agreement according to the verb; in the second sentence, the personal pronoun “the” is the direct object and replaces “Romain`s new motorcycle”; the past “purchased” stake is therefore compliant.] [Who/what is washed?” –> “They.” The subject is therefore the addressee of the complaint, there is a consensus.] For some verbs, the past partizide must correspond either to the subject or to the object of the sentence, in number and sex. This concordance is necessary in the following situations: 5) In the case of a change of half-aid, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not to the half-auxiliary obstructive. Here is the compound passed with the rule of having: if the name is replaced by an object name, this pronoun is of course always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no correspondence with the latter. However, since the direct object now precedes the verb, the past part is subject to the direct conformity of the object. Pronominal verbs have a reflexive pronoun that relates to the subject, and this reflex pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here`s the trick: concordance is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; If it is indirect, there is no agreement.
So, to know if past participation agrees, one must determine the function of the reflexive pronoun. Here`s how you do it. Students spend hours understanding past compound agreements. Many people want to reject the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and chat on Facebook: A verb composed of an auxiliary verb and a main verb is called in grammar as a form of composite tense, unlike a simple tense form that uses only the main verb. However, if you learn French to communicate in French, all these agreements will be silent most often! It`s only the writing that counts. But the verbs of Have need coherence in a very specific construction: the past participation must correspond to the direct object if it precedes the verb. [Who/what is washed?” –> “hands.”